Source receipt
Data protection and security review
meeting_transcriptL1
Surrounding conversation
those. So it names her perfectly well without using her name,
Sure.
and it is an assessment of an individual's competence held by a third party, which she has never seen.
That is correct and I had not thought about it that way.
Right.
Most people have not. Removing a name is not anonymisation if one person fits the description.
This is the application's current source record. Local dates from the archive retain their original timezone ambiguity. Source IDs and positions connect this passage to its document.